Review process and responsibilities for kernel source package inclusion in main
The 12.04 release includes 7 separate kernel source packages in main, not all of which are packages which Canonical has an interest in providing long-term security support for. Discuss how to best provide kernels in the archive that should not be security supported, or give the appearance of being security-supported based on component. Also come up with a plan for reviewing the set of kernels each cycle and dropping abandoned ones from the archive.
Blueprint information
- Status:
- Not started
- Approver:
- Colin Watson
- Priority:
- High
- Drafter:
- Steve Langasek
- Direction:
- Needs approval
- Assignee:
- None
- Definition:
- New
- Series goal:
- None
- Implementation:
- Unknown
- Milestone target:
- None
- Started by
- Completed by
Whiteboard
Example: linux-qcm-msm was seeded into main in lucid, but without its metapackage, and this was never reviewed even though support for the kernel (per https:/